Yuku free message boards

Brooklyn Red Leg wrote:

---

Yes, cause God knows appeal to ridicule fallacies are a great way to 'prove' your point. Too bad there isn't an Ignore function on this board cause I'd put you on that list here as well.

"Then, of course, I made alot of people not only mad, but apparently gave them the ammunition to question not only my intelligence level, but my ability to spacially reason when I agreed with the uRRG that the Sylphide could and should transform. Never mind that we do not have access to the unproduced portion of Southern Cross nor has anyone bothered to ask the Ammonite Studio design team that did the mecha for Southern Cross. Natually, this relates to Robotech more than Southern Cross since it was The Narrator that first said they were Veritechs (though later its an air traffic controller that calls them Veritechs), since the OSM is silent (in fact, nothing is known for certain outside its name)."

"The latest, of course, is the argument over the representation of the Battloids in the Robotech RPG 2nd Edition and whether some of them are accurately represented by the Shizoku Insert that says the models are all 1/48th scale (never mind that we have on-screen proof that the mecha are all of varying sizes, which throws that into contention). Yep, because I sided with the uRRG again and said the Fenris and Kraken should be powered armour (the former would be like the Queadlunn-Rau, while the latter is an exoskeleton), I'm again surrounded by 'controversy'. No one has been able to produce lineart that shows the height of said mecha. That would be the only way to conclusively provide 'accurate' information. On top of that, I get it from both ends: those who want to maintain OSM primacy for Robotech and then from people who only want the dialogue of Robotech to count."

Basara 549 wrote:

---

Not having read Brook's more recent posts at Palladium or places other than here in several years, I've not seen that kind of thing you speak of, Cav. In fact, most of the ones prior to then that I did read, the other person was being at least as pig-headed. And, I KNOW he doesn't act that way in real life (or, at least at Gen Con with me, FPilot, and Tom Bateman).

However, YOU are the one that keep acting in the way you accuse him of, Cav, for things he's not done here to any extent. Try to keep it impartial, man... Brook's issues on the Palladium forums is that he's too apt to drop to the other's guy's level in an argument, instead of making any attempt at keeping out of the muck. Not everyone is the same everywhere they go - Hell, there was one Anime Central where Mad Mike Choi and BRUCE LEWIS were actually getting along and having fun at a room party - at least until Mad Mike realized who the other guy was, and walked out of the party, to keep from being tossed out of the con for assaulting a guest (now, THAT was fun to watch).

Frankly, I have to fight from being that way on the Stratics forums that I moderate for Ultima Online. I keep having to take actions against one little peckerhead that keeps insisting that he has the right to brag about scamming other players, posting links to things against Stratics and UO rules, and advertising cheating programs - then he whines to my superiors that I have a personal vendetta against him (to which, of course, they laugh).

I have a better idea -

Let's not discuss people's actions on other forums here, unless we're discussing improper moderator/administrator actions by the Yun(e)s at their little playground.

Basara 549 wrote:

---

Thank you for proving MY point so succinctly, Cav.

FPilot wrote:

---

Who says we have to address your points OR Brook's?